Exotic Sugar Gliders Under Heavy Protection in Malaysia
Sugar Gliders Petaurus breviceps are not just popular as pets in Malaysia; they are also commonly sold in Thailand and the USA and other parts of the world.
Sweet-faced and wide-eyed, the Sugar Glider has become such a popular exotic pet in Malaysia that the country’s authorities want to put it on the protected animal list, to track the burgeoning trade better.
These small, shy nocturnal creatures are found only in the forests of eastern Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Australia. Most of those available in Malaysian pet shops originate from Indonesia.
Sugar Gliders are not fully protected under Indonesia’s wildlife laws, but are subject to a Government issued quota that dictates how many can be taken out of the wild each year.
In 2011 this quota supposedly restricted the harvest to just 225 individuals per year.
However, Malaysia’s Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Perhilitan, currently has almost 9,000 Sugar Gliders registered with the Department, suggesting quotas are being exceeded.
The species is not currently listed as protected under Malaysia’s Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 or International Act 2008 and Perhilitan recently announced they are taking steps to remedy this.
Dr Zaaba Zainol Abidin, Perhilitan’s Deputy Director stated that the Department wants to protect the species from the illegal wildlife trade, which is quite rampant.
In March last year, for example, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency seized 200 Sugar Gliders from two Indonesian traders entering the country at a port in Johor, the southernmost state of Peninsular Malaysia.
“TRAFFIC welcomes this proactive move by Perhilitan to control the trade in Sugar Gliders,” said Chris R. Shepherd, Deputy Regional Director of TRAFFIC Southeast Asia.
“We support these efforts to provide better protection against illegal wildlife trade, which in many countries appears to continue with little interruption from the authorities.”
“Current levels of trade in wild-caught Sugar Gliders not only indicate that quotas are being ignored, but also suggest trade may potentially be a serious threat to this species.”